Highlights from the Asian Society for Vascular Surgery 2025
The Asian Society for Vascular Surgery (ASVS) 2025 congress brought vascular specialists together in Singapore from 28 to 31 August 2025 at the Grand Copthorne Waterfront. Looking back at the meeting, two themes stand out for me: the continuing importance of open aortic surgery and the careful evaluation of artificial intelligence in vascular care.
I had the privilege of contributing as a member of the local organising committee and presenting two talks: Retroperitoneal Approach to the Aorta: Back to the Future and AI in Vascular Surgery: Rise of the Machine. They explored different aspects of the same responsibility: choosing care that is appropriate for the person in front of us.
As a vascular and endovascular surgeon in Singapore, I value meetings that connect surgical experience, research and practical discussion. This retrospective shares the ideas behind those talks and explains their relevance for patients.
Why does open aortic surgery still matter?
The aorta is the bodyâs main artery. An aortic aneurysm is an abnormal enlargement of part of that artery. Depending on its size, growth, location and symptoms, an aneurysm may need surveillance or repair. My guide to aortic disease and aneurysm treatment explains the conditions and the main treatment options.
Endovascular aneurysm repair, or EVAR, uses a stent graft placed through the blood vessels to treat a suitable aneurysm from within. It has changed aortic practice, but open surgery remains important when anatomy, previous treatment or other clinical factors make it the more appropriate option.
What is the retroperitoneal approach to the aorta?
The retroperitoneal approach reaches the aorta through the space behind the lining of the abdominal cavity. It is an established route for selected open aortic operations. My talk revisited why this technique remains relevant alongside modern endovascular treatment.
The route of access matters because the surgeon needs a clear view of the diseased artery and its important branches. Previous abdominal operations, the extent of aortic disease and the planned repair can all influence the choice. A retroperitoneal operation is still major surgery, with risks that need individual discussion.
Is open surgery better than EVAR?
Neither is the best option for everyone. The decision depends on the aneurysmâs anatomy, overall health, procedural risks, durability and follow-up requirements. Some patients do not need an operation at all and are better served by monitoring and medical care.
For a patient-friendly explanation of the stent-graft approach, read how EVAR treats an aortic aneurysm. The useful question is which approach offers a suitable balance of benefits and risks for you.
What could artificial intelligence contribute to vascular surgery?
My second talk considered how artificial intelligence, or AI, might support vascular practice. Research includes analysing medical images, identifying patterns in clinical data and estimating risks. These applications raise useful questions about how clinicians interpret information and plan care.
Why does validation matter?
A model that performs well in a research dataset may not work equally well in a different hospital or patient population. Before relying on a tool, clinicians need evidence about its accuracy, limitations and usefulness in practice. Data quality, privacy and ongoing oversight matter as much as an impressive demonstration.
Will AI replace a vascular surgeon?
AI tools should support clinical judgement, with human oversight. They cannot by themselves provide the full conversation about symptoms, examination findings, scan results, personal priorities and treatment choices. A prediction also needs to be explained in a way that helps a patient make an informed decision.
For patients, the practical question is whether a particular tool has been shown to help in their situation. Discussing emerging technology at a conference does not mean that every application is established or routinely used in the clinic.
Friends, colleagues and shared learning
One of the pleasures of ASVS 2025 was reconnecting with friends and colleagues from across the world. Sharing experience gives us opportunities to question assumptions, discuss difficult decisions and learn from approaches used in different settings.
The photographs below capture some of those connections. They are a reminder that professional education also happens through conversation and collaboration.
What do these discussions mean for patients?
The message I took from these two talks is that established surgical skills and new technology both need thoughtful application. The aim is to understand the condition, explain the available options and agree a plan suited to the individual.
If you are discussing an aortic aneurysm with your surgeon, useful questions include:
What do my scans show, and how has the aneurysm changed?
Is surveillance appropriate, or is there a reason to consider repair now?
What are the benefits and risks of the options suitable for my anatomy?
What follow-up would I need after treatment?
I am grateful for the opportunity to share my work at ASVS 2025 and learn from colleagues. Continuing education remains part of how I approach vascular care, alongside careful assessment and clear communication with patients.
Sharing perspectives with fellow panellists at ASVS 2025 in Singapore.
Vascular assessment in Singapore
For questions about known aortic disease or treatment options, contact Andrew Choong Vascular Surgery at Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Centre, #09-22, 38 Irrawaddy Road, Singapore 329563. Previous scan reports and a medication list can help make the consultation more useful.
You can also explore my aortic awareness information and educational channels and updates.
This is a retrospective of a professional meeting and provides general education. Decisions about investigation or treatment require an individual clinical assessment.